Skip to main content

Accreditation is a comprehensive evaluation process that ensures institutions of higher education meet rigorous standards of quality and effectiveness. It serves as a public statement of institutional integrity and commitment to excellence.

Through peer review and self-assessment, accreditation validates that an institution provides quality education, maintains appropriate resources, and demonstrates a commitment to continuous improvement and innovation.

Our Accreditation

Smith College is accredited by the New England Commission of Higher Education (NECHE).

As a member institution, Smith College meets the Standards for Accreditation established by NECHE to ensure quality, innovation, and student success.

The New England Commission of Higher Education, established in 1885, is recognized as an institutional accreditor by the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) and serves as a reliable authority and independent voice on the quality of higher education. The Commission is a voluntary, peer-based, non-governmental membership association which promotes educational excellence and quality assurance to its over 200 member institutions both inside and outside the United States, all of which are degree granting post-secondary educational institutions offering higher education. NECHE, through its membership, has established Standards of Accreditation to ensure quality, innovation, and student success across the ever-evolving landscape of higher education.

View Our Accreditation Landing Page NECHE’s Roster
“Accreditation is a quality check. It’s a process where an outside organization—like NECHE—reviews a school to confirm it provides a solid education, has qualified faculty and staff, adequate resources, and supports student success.”
New England Commission of Higher Education

2026 NECHE Standards

NECHE’s 2026 Standards for Accreditation reflect the collective voice of their membership. Smith College demonstrates excellence across all five standards, each representing critical dimensions of institutional quality and effectiveness.

The institution’s mission defines its distinctive character, provides direction for institutional activities, and forms the basis for institutional planning, resource allocation, assessment, and improvement. The institution has a system of governance, internal and at the Board level, that facilitates the accomplishment of its mission, provides for effective planning and evaluation, and supports institutional improvement and innovation. The institution has sufficient autonomy and control of its programs and operations to be held accountable for meeting the Commission’s Standards for Accreditation. 

The institution’s academic program and student services are consistent with and serve to fulfill its mission and purposes. The institution works systematically and effectively to plan, provide, oversee, evaluate, improve, and assure the quality and integrity of its academic programs and credits and degrees awarded as well as its student services and co-curricular programs. The institution supports teaching and learning through a well-qualified faculty and academic staff, who, in structures and processes appropriate to the institution, collectively ensure the quality of instruction and support for student learning. The institution sets a standard of student achievement appropriate to the degree or certificate awarded and develops systematic means to demonstrate how and what students are learning and to use the evidence provided to improve the academic program. 

The institution has and maintains sufficient human, financial, information, physical, and technological resources and capacity to support its mission wherever and however its academic programs are offered. Through periodic evaluation, the institution demonstrates that its resources are sufficient to sustain the quality of its educational program and to support institutional improvement now and on an ongoing basis. The institution demonstrates, through internal and external evidence, its financial capacity to graduate its entering class. The institution administers its resources in an ethical manner that assures effective systems of enterprise risk management, regulatory compliance, and internal controls. 

The institution demonstrates its educational effectiveness and the success of all students by ensuring appropriate levels of student achievement on mission-appropriate student outcomes. Based on sustained, evidence-based reflection and study, the institution employs comprehensive quality assurance processes to demonstrate and continually improve institutional effectiveness and student learning and success. 

Through its commitment to ethical practices, transparency, and accountability, the institution upholds high standards in all its operations. It provides accurate, timely, and accessible information to all constituents, including the public and the Commission. 

Timeline

Fall 2025

Kick-off of the Assessment Steering Committee, responsible for reviewing, updating, and receiving feedback on the Essential Capacities, which are Smith’s learning goals for our open curriculum.

January 2026

January Faculty retreat, the first robust engagement with a large faculty audience to guide the work of the Assessment Steering Committee and the development of updated Essential Capacities.

Fall 2026–Spring 2027

Throughout the 2026-27 academic year, students, faculty, and staff will have opportunities to engage with different parts of the accreditation process. This may be through listening sessions, feedback sessions, faculty engagement on curricular matters, or participating in writing and reviewing the self-study.

Early Summer 2027

Smith’s self-study is completed. The report is officially handed off to NECHE, and preparations continue for the onsite visit.

October 2027

The on-site visit will take place October 3–6, 2027. Smith will be visited by a team of experienced professionals at peer institutions, selected by NECHE. They will read our self-study in advance and conduct campus interviews, including open forums. The visiting team provides a report, listing strengths and weaknesses, and formally makes a confidential recommendation to NECHE.

Spring 2028

Smith’s self-study, along with the visiting team’s report and recommendation, are reviewed by members of the Commission, which includes higher education professionals, employers, and members of the public. Smith’s president attends a meeting with the Commission to answer questions and receive the Commission’s decision. Some weeks after this meeting, Smith will receive a letter formalizing the decision and identifying areas of focus to include in the mid-cycle report due 2032.

Photo by Jessica Scranton